<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rocket Monkey Rodeo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rocketmonkeyrodeo.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rocketmonkeyrodeo.com/blog</link>
	<description>Small Business Services. Training. Architectural Visualization. Computer Support.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Birmingham Has a Unique Personal Trainer by personal trainer</title>
		<link>http://rocketmonkeyrodeo.com/blog/2008/08/26/birmingham-has-a-unique-personal-trainer/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>personal trainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 06:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocketmonkeyrodeo.com/blog/2008/08/26/birmingham-has-a-unique-personal-trainer/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Head Phones for iPod, etc. by mickeycoke</title>
		<link>http://rocketmonkeyrodeo.com/blog/2007/12/07/head-phones-for-ipod-etc/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>mickeycoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocketmonkeyrodeo.com/blog/2007/12/07/head-phones-for-ipod-etc/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Best price I found $14.95 +2.95 Shipping
http://www.mypilotstore.com/mypilotstore/cart/default.asp?wtsku=4106</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best price I found $14.95 +2.95 Shipping<br />
<a href="http://www.mypilotstore.com/mypilotstore/cart/default.asp?wtsku=4106" rel="nofollow">http://www.mypilotstore.com/mypilotstore/cart/default.asp?wtsku=4106</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Spinrite on Mac OS X Drives by mickeycoke</title>
		<link>http://rocketmonkeyrodeo.com/blog/2007/09/12/using-spinrite-on-mac-os-x-drives/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>mickeycoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rocketmonkeyrodeo.com/blog/2007/09/12/using-spinrite-on-mac-os-x-drives/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Comment by Mark S. via email
A few thoughts.
Mac OSX can't do anything against drive failure. It is protecting at a higher level of process failure. Multiple processes are hitting a filesystem. A process can fail and leave the system in an inconsistent state. With journaling the failure will show up as an entry that doesn't have a successful closure. Other processes that will involve the failure then know to roll the failure back before proceeding. If no other process involves the failure then it will be rolled back at shutdown or at startup. If a problem is severe enough the filesystem has the unique ability of being frozen so it can be repaired. Freezing allows the OS to make a repair that normally could only happen in single user mode during startup or shutdown (a book I am reading says HFS+ is the only filesystem they had seen that could be frozen).
HFS+ borrows ideas from databases. It is not block and i-node based but tree based. This somehow (I don't know the particulars) means they are actively keeping track of block in a tree structure so that the filesystem doesn't fragment.
HFS+ treats small files different then large files. A simpler data structure is used for small files so there is less overhead. Large files have a more complicated data structure but it allows for virtually unlimited file sizes (its not unlimited but it is huge). Most recently used files that are of the small file structure are moved to occupy the middle of the platter so statistically they can be accessed quicker.
Boot data is written redundantly to a disk so that a system has a better chance of surviving a crash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by Mark S. via email<br />
A few thoughts.<br />
Mac OSX can&#8217;t do anything against drive failure. It is protecting at a higher level of process failure. Multiple processes are hitting a filesystem. A process can fail and leave the system in an inconsistent state. With journaling the failure will show up as an entry that doesn&#8217;t have a successful closure. Other processes that will involve the failure then know to roll the failure back before proceeding. If no other process involves the failure then it will be rolled back at shutdown or at startup. If a problem is severe enough the filesystem has the unique ability of being frozen so it can be repaired. Freezing allows the OS to make a repair that normally could only happen in single user mode during startup or shutdown (a book I am reading says HFS+ is the only filesystem they had seen that could be frozen).<br />
HFS+ borrows ideas from databases. It is not block and i-node based but tree based. This somehow (I don&#8217;t know the particulars) means they are actively keeping track of block in a tree structure so that the filesystem doesn&#8217;t fragment.<br />
HFS+ treats small files different then large files. A simpler data structure is used for small files so there is less overhead. Large files have a more complicated data structure but it allows for virtually unlimited file sizes (its not unlimited but it is huge). Most recently used files that are of the small file structure are moved to occupy the middle of the platter so statistically they can be accessed quicker.<br />
Boot data is written redundantly to a disk so that a system has a better chance of surviving a crash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
